Skip to main content

of the Hereafter

Of the Hereafter

[Modified from the Writer's Almanac for 11-29] After the death of his wife, Joy, in 1960, CS Lewis was devastated. He wrote a book, A Grief Observed (1961), which contained his thoughts, questions, and observations. It was so raw and personal that he published it under a pseudonym. Friends actually recommended the book to him, to help with his grief, unaware that he'd written it. His authorship wasn't made known until after his death in 1963. In the book, he writes that he doesn't believe people are reunited with their loved ones in the next life. 

~What do you think? Will we see our departed loved ones in heaven?

Comments

mtspace said…
Everything depends on a definition of terms.

Subsequent generations of people will reuse some of the same atoms that are in our bodies. But they will not be us. If people possess some quality that endures beyond this physical sphere, then existence in that sphere must necessarily be profoundly different, experience in that sphere must be profoundly different, and our notions of attachment are likely to be profoundly different. So the suggestion that our attachments here will translate directly to that sphere seem naive, at best. One might as well ask, will I want anchovies on my pizza and will I still be addicted to coffee?
Colleen said…
I haven't read Lewis's book, but I can say that I do not see the logical problem with seeing our loved ones in heaven. God has prepared many rooms for us, and why would we not be able to see those of our loved ones who also end up there?
[post by David C. Moyer]
Well, scripture is clear that they aren't married in the next life, but more than that I don't think we can say definitively. It appears that people continue to be recognizable as themselves. They do many things, mostly praising God, but other things as well.
even in the NT there is a comment that we are "surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses," purportedly in heaven...so, heaven must be reasonably populous...there is also the transfiguration account; if Moses and Elijah are there, why not my grandmother? Also, consider Jesus' comment to the thief on the cross...
James said…
I've read A Grief Observed, but I doubt Lewis was right on this one. Some of my reasons have already been cited. I'll just underscore that my understanding of the "communion of the saints" suggests the contrary. I go further. My own father spoke to me after his death. Granted, it was only once and very briefly a week or so after the funeral. But then he spoke from eternity back into time. My own physical death would seem in fact to strike down a barrier between two "realms."
Jim,
Thanks - I also remember reading "A Severe Mercy," by Sheldon Vanauken [and I believe Lewis may have written a preface or an endorsement of that book?]...In it the author claims his deceased wife was present in his life for awhile, in spirit, after she died...

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters: Nigeria's Islamists targeting Christians to provoke religious war, says minister Felix Onuah

See: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nigeria-security/nigerias-islamists-targeting-christians-to-provoke-religious-war-says-minister-idUSKCN20L2K9?utm_campaign=5d32c47a3d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_02_28_02_38&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-5d32c47a3d-400094773   

The Atlantic: The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy Why civil marriage should not encompass group unions

" Where does the next advance come?" he asks in an essay at  Politico.  "Now that we've defined that love and devotion and family isn't driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy.... Gay marriage remains illegal in Australia, most of Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and parts of Europe and Mexico; the most liberal of those countries strike me as the most natural places for "the next advance" of marriage. I'd urge my fellow gay-marriage proponents to focus their efforts there––and legalizing group marriage in America right now would strengthen the hands of gay-marriage opponents abroad, confirming slippery-slope arguments that were raised and rejected here. If it ever made sense to avoid this fight as a matter of political strategy, it still does; if gay marriage was ever a more important priority​ than plural marriage, it remains so." ~ Freddie de Boe...