Skip to main content

Quote

There is no wisdom save in truth. Truth is everlasting, but our ideas about truth are changeable. Only a little of the first fruits of wisdom, only a few fragments of the boundless heights, breadths and depths of truth, have I been able to gather.

Martin Luther 

Comments

mtspace said…
It's a great quotation, one which I needed to hear.

I think that truth can take on at least two common senses in natural language. One is a kind of verifiable factuality. Today when we speak of something being true, this us almost always what we mean. The second is a kind of useful wisdom or adherence to a high ideal. When one of Shakespeare's men said of a friend that he was 'good and true' he was speaking much more of that friend's loyalty, than of his veracity. Similarly, a true wheel was a round wheel centered on its hub and perpendicular to its shaft: a true wheel behaves in a kind of idealized way.

Martin Luther in the above passage is talking about truth not as fact, but as a body of ideas that help us find meaning and satisfaction in life. I find it useful to hear this passage because I have been blaming the protestant reformation for dumbing down the notion of truth to exclude the second more abstract meaning, thereby stripping holy texts of any nourishment they might have for the soul. I might still imagine that this happened, but at least it's good to know that it was not Luther's fault.
I especially like how he says that TRUTH is everlasting, but our ideas are changeable...I think he IS saying truth is a FACT but that our perception of it changes...

Popular posts from this blog

Re: Science and Christianity--Can these both be believed?

David Moyer Posted:      I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not prov...

Psychology and Spirituality: A Model for Seeking the Essentials

Sometime ago, Psychology--as a field--moved in the direction of including spirituality as an important dimension of peoples' lives, and away from the longstanding position that God [and religion] was an unimportant concept...Now there are trainings, books, college courses on addressing the spiritual concerns of clients in therapy. As I was attending one lecture on this subject It got me to reflecting on the Essentials concept...it would be foolish to reject out of hand "any good thing," such as the concept of energy meridians or recent scientific discoveries about how the  body [and brain] process pain signals, or the nuances of someone's culture and how it affects their viewpoint--that having been said, I propose that holding to a set of Essential beliefs and behaviors, while helping to define a spiritual position, should not be allowed to create an unassailable, Monolithic viewpoint...there is always diversity in religion [even within denominations]...this is probab...