...Good points! Some of that can be managed by the administrative controls...with the Blog format the Moderator can edit and prevent invective, if needed...the Moderator would not do this unless a problem arose...since I am the only moderator [at this point] I can make those decisions at any time...but what you have written will help me in developing the POSTING GUIDELINES and Disclaimer's which I hope to have ready soon...
David Moyer Posted: I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not proven, but rather
Comments