Skip to main content

Dalai Lama on Marxism

By
Dalai Lama Espouses Marxism:

http://trueslant.com/abytharakan/2010/05/21/as-dalai-lama-embraces-red-will-marxism-help-where-hollywood-failed/

Comments

mtspace said…
Of course, there are many flavors of Marxism. All of them assume that one belongs to a productive society in which one trades a little liberty for a little corporate (community) care. For most well socialized people one would expect the trade-off to bring a greater sense of well-being.

Those who have grown up in dysfunctional families will, I think, believe that close associations far afield from family might be especially useful. One interesting outcome is that people who do not fit well in their families have other institutions to turn to for help - institutions neither assured to exist nor supported by the notion that the purpose of every institution is to turn a profit.

I see Marxism's motives as being more Christian than capitalism's. Where it comes off the rails is the Bolshevik notion that one may rightly use any means to achieve a desired end.
February 22, 2011 at 11:08 AM
James said…
I have some fairly deep problems with Marxism. For example, the Hegelian dialectic which it espouses (thesis in conflict with antithesis yields synthesis) is a simplistic model for understanding cosmic dynamics. Its implicit atheism and the view that "religion is the opiate of the masses" I totally reject. On the other hand, the liberation theology developed in Latin American countries emphasized the Marxist concern for equality and community. This is, of course, what the Dalai Lama wants to identify with. It's a very risky position for him to take. But then, he's been in a risky position ever since China invaded Tibet.
February 23, 2011 at 10:43 AM
TheGreatDialogue said…
...If I am not mistaken, Marx also urged there to be Free Public education...I think there may be something to be learned from every country that has put into practice Marxist ideas--we can learn much from a pragmatic analysis--maybe "capitalist" nations [economies?] could learn from socialist ones...?
February 24, 2011 at 7:46 AM
James said…
And speaking of Marxism (well, socialism anyway), let's bring this discussion closer to home (Tibet's beautiful, I hear, but I'll likely never get to see it). What insights does your faith provide you for viewing issues such as budget-cutting? How do justice and mercy figure into the conversation? How, for that matter, does walking humbly with God figure in?
February 25, 2011 at 8:29 PM
TheGreatDialogue said…
My belief is that we need to always take the needs of others seriously...sadly, government cannot always provide what is needed, at least not completely...personal giving of resources and time is the only way to combat poverty and disasters, and yet people privately often give too little - scripture talks about God putting in place rulers and government for our benefit, and that seems to me to be true sometimes - but when Jesus spoke about the poor or about others in need, he was asking US to personally be involved...
February 26, 2011 at 7:20 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Re: Science and Christianity--Can these both be believed?

By
David Moyer Posted:      I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not prov...
13 comments
Read more

Quote

By
There is no wisdom save in truth. Truth is everlasting, but our ideas about truth are changeable. Only a little of the first fruits of wisdom, only a few fragments of the boundless heights, breadths and depths of truth, have I been able to gather. Martin Luther  
2 comments
Read more

Psychology and Spirituality: A Model for Seeking the Essentials

By
Sometime ago, Psychology--as a field--moved in the direction of including spirituality as an important dimension of peoples' lives, and away from the longstanding position that God [and religion] was an unimportant concept...Now there are trainings, books, college courses on addressing the spiritual concerns of clients in therapy. As I was attending one lecture on this subject It got me to reflecting on the Essentials concept...it would be foolish to reject out of hand "any good thing," such as the concept of energy meridians or recent scientific discoveries about how the  body [and brain] process pain signals, or the nuances of someone's culture and how it affects their viewpoint--that having been said, I propose that holding to a set of Essential beliefs and behaviors, while helping to define a spiritual position, should not be allowed to create an unassailable, Monolithic viewpoint...there is always diversity in religion [even within denominations]...this is probab...
3 comments
Read more