Skip to main content

Dalai Lama on Marxism

Dalai Lama Espouses Marxism:

http://trueslant.com/abytharakan/2010/05/21/as-dalai-lama-embraces-red-will-marxism-help-where-hollywood-failed/

Comments

mtspace said…
Of course, there are many flavors of Marxism. All of them assume that one belongs to a productive society in which one trades a little liberty for a little corporate (community) care. For most well socialized people one would expect the trade-off to bring a greater sense of well-being.

Those who have grown up in dysfunctional families will, I think, believe that close associations far afield from family might be especially useful. One interesting outcome is that people who do not fit well in their families have other institutions to turn to for help - institutions neither assured to exist nor supported by the notion that the purpose of every institution is to turn a profit.

I see Marxism's motives as being more Christian than capitalism's. Where it comes off the rails is the Bolshevik notion that one may rightly use any means to achieve a desired end.
James said…
I have some fairly deep problems with Marxism. For example, the Hegelian dialectic which it espouses (thesis in conflict with antithesis yields synthesis) is a simplistic model for understanding cosmic dynamics. Its implicit atheism and the view that "religion is the opiate of the masses" I totally reject. On the other hand, the liberation theology developed in Latin American countries emphasized the Marxist concern for equality and community. This is, of course, what the Dalai Lama wants to identify with. It's a very risky position for him to take. But then, he's been in a risky position ever since China invaded Tibet.
...If I am not mistaken, Marx also urged there to be Free Public education...I think there may be something to be learned from every country that has put into practice Marxist ideas--we can learn much from a pragmatic analysis--maybe "capitalist" nations [economies?] could learn from socialist ones...?
James said…
And speaking of Marxism (well, socialism anyway), let's bring this discussion closer to home (Tibet's beautiful, I hear, but I'll likely never get to see it). What insights does your faith provide you for viewing issues such as budget-cutting? How do justice and mercy figure into the conversation? How, for that matter, does walking humbly with God figure in?
My belief is that we need to always take the needs of others seriously...sadly, government cannot always provide what is needed, at least not completely...personal giving of resources and time is the only way to combat poverty and disasters, and yet people privately often give too little - scripture talks about God putting in place rulers and government for our benefit, and that seems to me to be true sometimes - but when Jesus spoke about the poor or about others in need, he was asking US to personally be involved...

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters: Nigeria's Islamists targeting Christians to provoke religious war, says minister Felix Onuah

See: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nigeria-security/nigerias-islamists-targeting-christians-to-provoke-religious-war-says-minister-idUSKCN20L2K9?utm_campaign=5d32c47a3d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_02_28_02_38&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-5d32c47a3d-400094773   

The Atlantic: The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy Why civil marriage should not encompass group unions

" Where does the next advance come?" he asks in an essay at  Politico.  "Now that we've defined that love and devotion and family isn't driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy.... Gay marriage remains illegal in Australia, most of Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and parts of Europe and Mexico; the most liberal of those countries strike me as the most natural places for "the next advance" of marriage. I'd urge my fellow gay-marriage proponents to focus their efforts there––and legalizing group marriage in America right now would strengthen the hands of gay-marriage opponents abroad, confirming slippery-slope arguments that were raised and rejected here. If it ever made sense to avoid this fight as a matter of political strategy, it still does; if gay marriage was ever a more important priority​ than plural marriage, it remains so." ~ Freddie de Boe...