Skip to main content

Dalai Lama on Marxism

Dalai Lama Espouses Marxism:

http://trueslant.com/abytharakan/2010/05/21/as-dalai-lama-embraces-red-will-marxism-help-where-hollywood-failed/

Comments

mtspace said…
Of course, there are many flavors of Marxism. All of them assume that one belongs to a productive society in which one trades a little liberty for a little corporate (community) care. For most well socialized people one would expect the trade-off to bring a greater sense of well-being.

Those who have grown up in dysfunctional families will, I think, believe that close associations far afield from family might be especially useful. One interesting outcome is that people who do not fit well in their families have other institutions to turn to for help - institutions neither assured to exist nor supported by the notion that the purpose of every institution is to turn a profit.

I see Marxism's motives as being more Christian than capitalism's. Where it comes off the rails is the Bolshevik notion that one may rightly use any means to achieve a desired end.
James said…
I have some fairly deep problems with Marxism. For example, the Hegelian dialectic which it espouses (thesis in conflict with antithesis yields synthesis) is a simplistic model for understanding cosmic dynamics. Its implicit atheism and the view that "religion is the opiate of the masses" I totally reject. On the other hand, the liberation theology developed in Latin American countries emphasized the Marxist concern for equality and community. This is, of course, what the Dalai Lama wants to identify with. It's a very risky position for him to take. But then, he's been in a risky position ever since China invaded Tibet.
...If I am not mistaken, Marx also urged there to be Free Public education...I think there may be something to be learned from every country that has put into practice Marxist ideas--we can learn much from a pragmatic analysis--maybe "capitalist" nations [economies?] could learn from socialist ones...?
James said…
And speaking of Marxism (well, socialism anyway), let's bring this discussion closer to home (Tibet's beautiful, I hear, but I'll likely never get to see it). What insights does your faith provide you for viewing issues such as budget-cutting? How do justice and mercy figure into the conversation? How, for that matter, does walking humbly with God figure in?
My belief is that we need to always take the needs of others seriously...sadly, government cannot always provide what is needed, at least not completely...personal giving of resources and time is the only way to combat poverty and disasters, and yet people privately often give too little - scripture talks about God putting in place rulers and government for our benefit, and that seems to me to be true sometimes - but when Jesus spoke about the poor or about others in need, he was asking US to personally be involved...

Popular posts from this blog

Re: Science and Christianity--Can these both be believed?

David Moyer Posted:      I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not proven, but rather

Rob Bell, Christianity Popular and Out of Context...

Good Morning    I have been reading about Pastor Rob Bell - Pastor Bell has written a book in which he asserts that there IS NO HELL - while quoting scriptures out of context [and very fluidly] to make his point - Below is a link to a NY TIMES article about him [TIME magazine made it the cover story a week ago].    This stands out for me as one of the greatest problems for the Dialogue, and society; how to approach examples in which a newer "form" of Christianity becomes popular but in total disregard for traditional and even explicit, foundational, Church teaching...there appear to be, in the mind of many, no Essentials to anything...Will science be next? See: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/us/05bell.html

State and Religion

Steve - I agree that there is a need for ongoing dialogue about this - in almost every case when the state has a endorsed a "State religion" problems arise...and even in America, where there is a lot of freedom to choose one's religious practice and to carry it out unimpeded, we still see many trying to use courts and legislative actions to limit or remove one or another group's rights [sometimes even private citizens rights] to practice their own religion peaceably.       I certainly do not have any easy answers: this country was designed to allow tolerance of diverse ideas and views, but our international policies and actions seem to me, at times, to belie that. and internally, many of us are very intolerant of other's worldviews...I hope the Dalai Lama's decision plays out as he hopes... As for the USA, If Christians would take the lead in promoting religious tolerance it might help...I find it hardest to be that person when it comes to my closest associa