Sometime ago, Psychology--as a field--moved in the direction of including spirituality as an important dimension of peoples' lives, and away from the longstanding position that God [and religion] was an unimportant concept...Now there are trainings, books, college courses on addressing the spiritual concerns of clients in therapy. As I was attending one lecture on this subject It got me to reflecting on the Essentials concept...it would be foolish to reject out of hand "any good thing," such as the concept of energy meridians or recent scientific discoveries about how the body [and brain] process pain signals, or the nuances of someone's culture and how it affects their viewpoint--that having been said, I propose that holding to a set of Essential beliefs and behaviors, while helping to define a spiritual position, should not be allowed to create an unassailable, Monolithic viewpoint...there is always diversity in religion [even within denominations]...this is probab...
Comments
I guess there aren't too many places on earth where the church and the state are ruled from the same office. Iran, perhaps.
It marks a triumph for the reformation/enlightenment idea that faith is a personal practice, but statehood is a societal one. Societal life and order, in this view, may be informed by religious ideals are not subjugated to religious doctrine. How we do this rightly is the subject of ongoing discussion.