Skip to main content

Buddha and Canon

Supposedly, today is Buddha's Birthday. There is a "belief" that when he was born dragons flew down from heaven and poured out water and "all the flowers on land and water bloomed simultaneously" [writer's almanac]. As a consequence, people celebrate this day by decorating with flowers, carrying flowers to temples ceremonially, and in Japan children pour tea over the heads of statues of Buddha...

It makes me think: maybe we DO need to canonize scriptures--this is likely not an Essential Buddhist belief, is it?  Besides, wouldn't he have been born TOO LATE for Dragons? I suspect that is also why some books were excluded from the Christian canon, e.g., because they held accounts of Jesus' acts or teachings that were markedly inconsistent with what was already accepted and known to have happened...odd, divergent accounts needed to be excluded on the basis they could not be credited...So here we see something in Buddhist lore that [and I realize this festival is probably not canonical for them] that maybe should be viewed as outside the Essential beliefs for Buddhists?...

Comments

Colleen said…
As I said before, I think the canon makes complete sense. What, after all, is a belief system if it does not exclude any beliefs? I suppose that is pantheism, but that is only one system. Others must, therefore, exclude some beliefs in preference of others. Christianity is no exception.
mtspace said…
There is propositional truth and there is the way we live. I think that it is necessary for institutions such as the church to declare and defend propositional truths that go to the heart of their mission. Defining canonical works is necessary in this context.

But religion comes alive in our cultural lives. It lives in the rituals and practices that we make part of our everyday practice. It occurs to me that the story of Christ's birth has many of the same trappings as that of the Buddha. For example, I have heard a story about a bearded fellow who travels through the sky in a sleigh pulled by reindeer, and delivers presents to children on the night preceding the anniversary of Christ's birth. It is such a compelling story that even in Japan where the rest of Christianity is no part of the culture, children wake up to presents on Christmas day.

So I would say "Never underestimate the transformative power of a good myth."
Colleen said…
I agree with you about myth and its power in our daily lives; however, I think we need to distinguish that we talking about what comprises essential beliefs. In light of that, Santa Claus is not an essential Christian belief.
...I would add that while Myth is transformational for many, adherence to a set of beliefs and behaviors is moreso...this is true whether it is national pride/patriotism or spiritual devotional practice...for example, my uncle [who is a Gnostic] attempted for several years to pan the Bible by comparing myths from other cultures to bible scriptures, and exhorting me as to how this or that greek / other myth could "guide one's behavior" just as well...I don't think it would be a guide unless the person was a serious adherent [maybe a devotee of Apollo?].

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters: Nigeria's Islamists targeting Christians to provoke religious war, says minister Felix Onuah

See: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nigeria-security/nigerias-islamists-targeting-christians-to-provoke-religious-war-says-minister-idUSKCN20L2K9?utm_campaign=5d32c47a3d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_02_28_02_38&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-5d32c47a3d-400094773   

The Atlantic: The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy Why civil marriage should not encompass group unions

" Where does the next advance come?" he asks in an essay at  Politico.  "Now that we've defined that love and devotion and family isn't driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy.... Gay marriage remains illegal in Australia, most of Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and parts of Europe and Mexico; the most liberal of those countries strike me as the most natural places for "the next advance" of marriage. I'd urge my fellow gay-marriage proponents to focus their efforts there––and legalizing group marriage in America right now would strengthen the hands of gay-marriage opponents abroad, confirming slippery-slope arguments that were raised and rejected here. If it ever made sense to avoid this fight as a matter of political strategy, it still does; if gay marriage was ever a more important priority​ than plural marriage, it remains so." ~ Freddie de Boe...