Skip to main content

Buddha and Canon

Supposedly, today is Buddha's Birthday. There is a "belief" that when he was born dragons flew down from heaven and poured out water and "all the flowers on land and water bloomed simultaneously" [writer's almanac]. As a consequence, people celebrate this day by decorating with flowers, carrying flowers to temples ceremonially, and in Japan children pour tea over the heads of statues of Buddha...

It makes me think: maybe we DO need to canonize scriptures--this is likely not an Essential Buddhist belief, is it?  Besides, wouldn't he have been born TOO LATE for Dragons? I suspect that is also why some books were excluded from the Christian canon, e.g., because they held accounts of Jesus' acts or teachings that were markedly inconsistent with what was already accepted and known to have happened...odd, divergent accounts needed to be excluded on the basis they could not be credited...So here we see something in Buddhist lore that [and I realize this festival is probably not canonical for them] that maybe should be viewed as outside the Essential beliefs for Buddhists?...

Comments

Colleen said…
As I said before, I think the canon makes complete sense. What, after all, is a belief system if it does not exclude any beliefs? I suppose that is pantheism, but that is only one system. Others must, therefore, exclude some beliefs in preference of others. Christianity is no exception.
mtspace said…
There is propositional truth and there is the way we live. I think that it is necessary for institutions such as the church to declare and defend propositional truths that go to the heart of their mission. Defining canonical works is necessary in this context.

But religion comes alive in our cultural lives. It lives in the rituals and practices that we make part of our everyday practice. It occurs to me that the story of Christ's birth has many of the same trappings as that of the Buddha. For example, I have heard a story about a bearded fellow who travels through the sky in a sleigh pulled by reindeer, and delivers presents to children on the night preceding the anniversary of Christ's birth. It is such a compelling story that even in Japan where the rest of Christianity is no part of the culture, children wake up to presents on Christmas day.

So I would say "Never underestimate the transformative power of a good myth."
Colleen said…
I agree with you about myth and its power in our daily lives; however, I think we need to distinguish that we talking about what comprises essential beliefs. In light of that, Santa Claus is not an essential Christian belief.
...I would add that while Myth is transformational for many, adherence to a set of beliefs and behaviors is moreso...this is true whether it is national pride/patriotism or spiritual devotional practice...for example, my uncle [who is a Gnostic] attempted for several years to pan the Bible by comparing myths from other cultures to bible scriptures, and exhorting me as to how this or that greek / other myth could "guide one's behavior" just as well...I don't think it would be a guide unless the person was a serious adherent [maybe a devotee of Apollo?].

Popular posts from this blog

Re: Science and Christianity--Can these both be believed?

David Moyer Posted:      I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not proven, but rather

Rob Bell, Christianity Popular and Out of Context...

Good Morning    I have been reading about Pastor Rob Bell - Pastor Bell has written a book in which he asserts that there IS NO HELL - while quoting scriptures out of context [and very fluidly] to make his point - Below is a link to a NY TIMES article about him [TIME magazine made it the cover story a week ago].    This stands out for me as one of the greatest problems for the Dialogue, and society; how to approach examples in which a newer "form" of Christianity becomes popular but in total disregard for traditional and even explicit, foundational, Church teaching...there appear to be, in the mind of many, no Essentials to anything...Will science be next? See: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/us/05bell.html

State and Religion

Steve - I agree that there is a need for ongoing dialogue about this - in almost every case when the state has a endorsed a "State religion" problems arise...and even in America, where there is a lot of freedom to choose one's religious practice and to carry it out unimpeded, we still see many trying to use courts and legislative actions to limit or remove one or another group's rights [sometimes even private citizens rights] to practice their own religion peaceably.       I certainly do not have any easy answers: this country was designed to allow tolerance of diverse ideas and views, but our international policies and actions seem to me, at times, to belie that. and internally, many of us are very intolerant of other's worldviews...I hope the Dalai Lama's decision plays out as he hopes... As for the USA, If Christians would take the lead in promoting religious tolerance it might help...I find it hardest to be that person when it comes to my closest associa