Skip to main content
By

Something about Psalm 82 keeps returning and returning to my mind. It's the way it deals with "gods." Here's how it opens: "God takes his stand in the council of heaven; he gives judgment in the midst of the gods." This harks back to a time when the Hebrews could actually contemplate a pantheon of gods. It was just important that God be the head god, so to speak. This is reflected even in the words of the Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." But even in this Psalm a second view is presented: "Now I say to you, You are gods, and all of you children of the Most High; nevertheless, you shall die like mortals and fall like any prince." Who's this talking about? Gods? Or human beings? The Eastern Church talks about Christians becoming gods--"deification"--but they clearly are speaking figuratively to a certain extent. They never forget the distinction between the Creator and the creatures. Is this what the psalmist means?

I know little about what the Hebrews thought of other "gods' once they became thoroughly monotheistic. I'm also no expert on early Christian thought, but as far as I know it was Augustine who first thought that the gods of other religions were actually demons. Many of today's evangelical Christians probably follow Augustine on this one. But Augustine himself departed from this when he decided that many pagans who were actually quite compassionate and decent were actually serving God even though they thought they were following Mars or Diana or some other god. It seems never to have occurred to Augustine that this view conflicted with his idea that these other gods were demons. Even a mind as great as Augustine's has its blind spots.


Comments

TheGreatDialogue said…
Somewhere at home, I will have to look for it, I have a CD of a lecture by a Secular-Biblical Scholar who makes the case that the Hebrews only became monotheists as a result of the captivities they had endured, which somehow led to the adherence to monotheism.....he gives some complex proofs for this, but I think we need to at least consider that the bible already explains how this was: Jehovah sets things in motion to bring the Israelites out of egypt, where they very likely were not monotheists - they struggle to abandon the ways they worshipped in egypt, and later through the years after entering Canaan....As for broadly classifying all pagan gods as having been demons, I am not absolutely sure every god was--some may have merely had no exisitence.
July 16, 2013 at 11:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Re: Science and Christianity--Can these both be believed?

By
David Moyer Posted:      I am a Christian Engineer/Scientist and I have no problem with conflicts between the facts of science (as opposed to some hypotheses of science) and the teachings of scripture. I know literally dozens of other engineers and people with doctorates in technical fields including medicine, veterinary medicine, biology, etc. who also see no conflict. I was once a staunch evolutionist and I could easily teach a high school or community college course on evolution. There are some aspects of evolutionary theory/hypotheses with which I have no quarrel. But nearly the entire field is a matter of hypotheses with very little of it proven by the scientific method, because so little of it is falsifiable. It certainly does not deserve to be classified as a theory- that is a hypothesis that has been tests by real scientific methods so often that almost no one can devise another test that might disprove it. Remember, that scientific hypotheses are not proven, but rather
13 comments
Read more

Rob Bell, Christianity Popular and Out of Context...

By
Good Morning    I have been reading about Pastor Rob Bell - Pastor Bell has written a book in which he asserts that there IS NO HELL - while quoting scriptures out of context [and very fluidly] to make his point - Below is a link to a NY TIMES article about him [TIME magazine made it the cover story a week ago].    This stands out for me as one of the greatest problems for the Dialogue, and society; how to approach examples in which a newer "form" of Christianity becomes popular but in total disregard for traditional and even explicit, foundational, Church teaching...there appear to be, in the mind of many, no Essentials to anything...Will science be next? See: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/us/05bell.html
7 comments
Read more

State and Religion

By
Steve - I agree that there is a need for ongoing dialogue about this - in almost every case when the state has a endorsed a "State religion" problems arise...and even in America, where there is a lot of freedom to choose one's religious practice and to carry it out unimpeded, we still see many trying to use courts and legislative actions to limit or remove one or another group's rights [sometimes even private citizens rights] to practice their own religion peaceably.       I certainly do not have any easy answers: this country was designed to allow tolerance of diverse ideas and views, but our international policies and actions seem to me, at times, to belie that. and internally, many of us are very intolerant of other's worldviews...I hope the Dalai Lama's decision plays out as he hopes... As for the USA, If Christians would take the lead in promoting religious tolerance it might help...I find it hardest to be that person when it comes to my closest associa
6 comments
Read more