Skip to main content

Avoiding Conflict online or in-person

Some Things to consider when having a conversation with someone about a contentious topic

October, 2017

~Wayne David Schmoyer

Principle A:  When anyone is urgently expressing something verbally the surface message about their chosen topic may or may not be worded the way they want to say it – But what they think the topic MEANS to them is the important thing behind the surface message. So:

1] Try not to argue with the surface meaning and 2] try to learn what the meaning of the topic is for them.

Principle B: The goal of communication is to share ideas, not to disprove others ideas.

Principle C: Effective two way communication will bring about a sense of relief for both parties; if it doesn't then it is not effective.

STEPS:

ONE: REMEMBER that you have no obligation to engage in a debate just because you disagree with the other person; reserve the right to just listen and get more information.

TWO: You should respond but also be polite and get more information about

 1] why the other person believes what they said and 2] what it means for them.

THREE: Remember that during the conversation you will both misunderstand each other's

1] motives and the 2] meanings behind the words being used.

FOUR: Always listen more than you speak; speak less than you usually do.

FIVE: End the conversation sooner, rather than later; don't let it go on too long.

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reuters: Nigeria's Islamists targeting Christians to provoke religious war, says minister Felix Onuah

See: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nigeria-security/nigerias-islamists-targeting-christians-to-provoke-religious-war-says-minister-idUSKCN20L2K9?utm_campaign=5d32c47a3d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_02_28_02_38&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-5d32c47a3d-400094773   

The Atlantic: The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy Why civil marriage should not encompass group unions

" Where does the next advance come?" he asks in an essay at  Politico.  "Now that we've defined that love and devotion and family isn't driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy.... Gay marriage remains illegal in Australia, most of Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and parts of Europe and Mexico; the most liberal of those countries strike me as the most natural places for "the next advance" of marriage. I'd urge my fellow gay-marriage proponents to focus their efforts there––and legalizing group marriage in America right now would strengthen the hands of gay-marriage opponents abroad, confirming slippery-slope arguments that were raised and rejected here. If it ever made sense to avoid this fight as a matter of political strategy, it still does; if gay marriage was ever a more important priority​ than plural marriage, it remains so." ~ Freddie de Boe...